Philosophical JournalDiary reflecting one's own thoughts and opinions Essay

Philosophical JournalDiary reflecting one's own thoughts and opinions upon several topics. Details below - Essay Example In the above context, the opposite choice group feel that the decision of assisting in euthanasia is intention to kill. In contract, the pro-choice groups argue that the favouring of euthanasia is due to intention of achievement of good and comfortable death. In that context, the opposite choice group feel that the sanctity of life is above the autonomy of one's decision to live or die. While discussing about the dividing line between acceptable and unacceptable measures, Somerville Margaret (2002), argues that both sides are wrong as the dividing line lies somewhere in the middle of both the arguments. The balance of the arguments lies in the right of competent adults to refuse treatment, which is painful. The refusal for the treatment lies in the fact that it is their right to have a treatment that can relieve pain even it shortens the life. Hence, the argument void of right of refusal of the painful treatment does not give a clear logic about the Euthanasia irrespective of pro and anti arguments. 1 While discussing pros and cons of Euthanasia, one have to consider the modern Hippocratic Oath that is taken by medical students from 1964. In that, it is clear that a doctor should avoid the twin traps of over treatment and therapeutic nihilism. Here one can quote Louis Lasagna about nihilism, which is a doctrine that declares nothing can be known or communicated. As Louis Lasagna is against therapeutic nihilism, the doctor should consider the views and intentions of patient regarding Euthanasia and should think combining them with medical ethics. In addition the modern Hippocratic Oath on web site of Nova Onlilne (pbs.org) states that, the duty of the doctor is to tread with care in matters of life and death. The doctor has to act responsibly in case of saving and taking life but with all humbleness and awareness. The above factor supports the idea of taking a life of patient on moral and humanitarian grounds without acting on god. Hence, as per the responsibility of the modern Hi ppocratic Oath, the administrations can allow Euthanasia in special cases that are according to norms prescribed in legislation. The modern Hippocratic Oath also states that "The doctor should treat a patient keeping in mind a sick human being but not a fever chart of a cancerous growth". The above quote states that the doctor should follow moral values and more technical while prescribing and emotional while treating. However, the emotions should not dominate the treatment, but they should guide the doctor up to the level maintaining morality about addressing the concerns of family and economic stability of the patient. According to above concerns in modern Hippocratic Oath, the pro choice groups can argue that the Euthanasia is reasonable if it relieves a patient from his painful sickness in the context of medical science is unable to treat him or relieve him of pain. Even in that inevitable situation, the question arises about the poor patient who suffers and cannot avail the benefits of medical science. In the above context, the role of

The Holocaust with Its Many Dimensions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 5250 words

The Holocaust with Its Many Dimensions - Essay Example This Anti-Semitic movement was planned primarily to deprive the Jews from civil and political liberties that enabled their representation as a nation in Europe which was pointed by Adolf Hitler in order to satisfy his racial hygiene perception. In order to understand the destructive memoirs of the Holocaust we need to scrutinize Adolf Hitler as an individual who conspired the entire movement just because of his own beliefs and perceptions against the Jews and how he analyzed and consumed the vantage point of his power that he possessed right at that point in time. Through out the world the Holocaust period is known as an animation of Adolf Hitler's brutal motives and a symbol of inhumanity acknowledged by the vicious tactics which were employed to slowly or swiftly kill the people. To scrutinize meticulously the entire Holocaust movement with numerous aspects attached with it and most eminently to understand thoroughly the role of Adolf Hitler in this entire genocide can be done no better than through the source of the biography written on Adolf Hitler by 'Ian Kershaw'. This book was introduced to the literary world as just another brilliant addition to the Holocaust literature, but it differentiates itself from the typical in-depth Holocaust explanation solely because it projects for the most part Hitler's perception and his brutal aims and objectives leading directly towards the wiping off of Jews from the European realm completely which was his ultimate political objective. The author Ian Kershaw is a renowned historian and a professor teaching modern history at the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Ian Kershaw has primarily specialized in the medieval period and Nazi-Germany which inspired him to write numerous books on the respective subjects out of which most of the books were especially dedicated to the Holocaust period. This book was based on two volumes but eventually the fast track sales of this book convinced the literary world to combine the two to welcome a great source of understanding and innovative perceptions that Ian Kershaw introduced through this work of literature regarding the Holocaust and Adolf Hitler. Further description: Ian Kershaw with the inception of the book describes Hitler as someone who mistakenly entered the political sphere because as we recall correctly Hitler always aspired to be a famous painter which proves his credibility as a politician since he had no political upbringing or any sort of background for that matter. Kershaw also pointed out meticulously that Hitler entered the political sphere solely on the basis of his rhetorical capabilities which were out-standing if evaluated through his structured and coherent quality of speeches and regardless of what his political aims were. Moving on, the book explores Hitler's over all personality claiming like most of the texts based on Holocaust that Hitler had no private life possibly because he was so focused towards achieving his brutal revenge of a goal and because his possession of ultimate power at last required political participation every second of the day. "The book chooses to